Castells and The Network Society
The emergence of generative artificial intelligence has sparked profound debates about its potential impacts on society, economy, and culture at a global scale. While much attention focuses on the technical capabilities and immediate applications of these systems, a deeper theoretical framework is needed to contextualise their societal implications.
Manuel Castells' work on the network society and informational capitalism offers such a framework, providing analytical tools to understand how generative AI might reshape power relationships, economic structures, and cultural dynamics worldwide.
Castells' remarkable and definitive trilogy - The Rise of the Network Society (1996), The Power of Identity (1997), and End of Millennium (1998) - along with his later works like Communication Power (2009) and Networks of Outrage and Hope(2012), developed a comprehensive theory of how information technologies transform social structures through networked organisation.
This article applies Castells' key theoretical concepts to examine the emergent global impacts of generative AI technologies, arguing that his work provides crucial insights for understanding this technological revolution within broader social and historical contexts.
Power and Meaning
Castells' analysis of power in the network society is particularly relevant to understanding how generative AI may concentrate or redistribute power globally. In The Rise of the Network Society, Castells (1996) writes:
Networks constitute the new social morphology of our societies, and the diffusion of networking logic substantially modifies the operation and outcomes in processes of production, experience, power, and culture.
Generative AI represents an intensification of this network logic, producing automated content that flows throughout the global digital infrastructure. The concept of "communication power" that Castells develops in his 2009 work becomes especially significant when considering generative AI. He argues that:
Power in the network society is communication power ... Power is primarily exercised by the construction of meaning in the human mind through processes of communication.
Generative AI fundamentally transforms this communication power by automating meaning construction at unprecedented scale and speed. Castells' framework suggests that whoever controls generative AI systems - including their training data, algorithmic architecture, and computational resources - may exercise disproportionate influence over the construction and circulation of meaning in society.
This raises critical questions about the concentration of power among technology companies, primarily based in the United States and China, that lead in AI development. The "programmers" of these networks (to use Castells' terminology) potentially gain unprecedented influence over global information flows, cultural production, and economic opportunities.
Haves and Have-Nots
Castells' analysis of digital divides and networked inequality provides insights into how generative AI might exacerbate or transform global patterns of inclusion and exclusion. In The Internet Galaxy, Castells (2001) warns:
The differentiation between Internet-haves and have-nots adds a fundamental cleavage to existing sources of inequality and social exclusion in a complex interaction, that appears to increase the gap between the promise of the Information Age and its bleak reality for many people around the world.
Generative AI potentially amplifies these existing digital divides by creating new technological thresholds that separate those with access to advanced AI capabilities from those without. The resource-intensive nature of developing and deploying generative AI models - requiring vast datasets, specialised expertise, and significant computational power - creates barriers to entry that may disproportionately benefit already-advantaged regions and populations.
Moreover, Castells' attention to how networks create patterns of "switched-on" and "switched-off" nodes provides a powerful metaphor for understanding how generative AI might create new forms of exclusion. As these technologies reshape labour markets, educational systems, and cultural production, those without access or skills to leverage them risk being "switched off" from key economic and social opportunities. This dynamic operates both within nations (creating new forms of stratification) and between nations (potentially widening global economic disparities).
Culture and Meaning
Castells' exploration of how networked communications reshape cultural identity offers valuable perspective on generative AI's cultural impacts. In The Power of Identity (1997 , he observes:
Our societies are increasingly structured around the bipolar opposition of the Net and the Self ... People increasingly organise their meaning not around what they do but on the basis of what they are, or believe they are.
Generative AI introduces new tensions in this relationship between networked communication and cultural identity. By automating creative processes previously central to human cultural expression - writing, visual arts, music composition - these technologies potentially disrupt traditional connections between cultural production and identity. When AI systems can generate content in any cultural style or tradition, questions arise about authenticity, cultural appropriation, and the preservation of diverse cultural expressions.
Furthermore, Castells' analysis of how communication networks enable both cultural homogenisation and new expressions of diverse identities applies to generative AI. These systems, trained on predominantly Western and English-language data, may accelerate cultural homogenisation while simultaneously offering new tools for marginalised communities to amplify their cultural expressions - if they can access and adapt the technology.
Flows vs. Places
Castells' distinction between the "space of flows" (global digital networks) and the "space of places" (physical localities) becomes increasingly relevant with generative AI. He argues in The Rise of the Network Society(1996) that:
The space of flows ... links up distant localities around shared functions and meanings on the basis of electronic circuits and fast transportation corridors, while isolating and subduing the logic of experience embodied in the space of places.
Generative AI accelerates this tension by enabling seamless, instantaneous global content production disconnected from physical contexts. These technologies can generate content that mimics local cultural forms, without engagement with the localities that produced them, potentially undermining connections between cultural expression and place-based communities.
Additionally, generative AI may intensify what Castells calls "timeless time" - the compression and reorganisation of temporality in network society. The acceleration of content generation, processing of information, and automation of creative processes further compresses experiential time, with unpredictable consequences for human experience and social organisation.
Resistance and Counter-Networks
Finally, Castells' analysis of how networks enable new forms of resistance provides perspective on potential counter-hegemonic uses of generative AI. In Networks of Outrage and Hope, Castells (2012) observes:
By engaging in the production of mass self-communication messages ... social actors ... increase their chances of enacting social and political change - even if they start from a subordinate position in institutional power, financial resources, or symbolic legitimacy.
This suggests possibilities for marginalised communities to appropriate generative AI technologies for their own purposes, potentially challenging dominant power structures. Open-source AI models, community-controlled training datasets, and local adaptations of generative technologies might enable forms of "counter-power" that resist corporate or state domination of these technological systems.
However, the resource-intensive nature of advanced AI development poses significant challenges to such grassroots appropriation. Castells' framework suggests that resistance to dominant generative AI paradigms will likely require forming counter-networks that pool resources and expertise across traditional boundaries.
Impacts and Implications
Manuel Castells' analysis of network society helps us recognise generative AI as a sociotechnical system that reconfigures power relations, economic structures, and cultural processes in complex ways. His insights suggest several key implications for policy, governance, and research regarding generative AI.
First, addressing power concentration requires transparent governance mechanisms that extend beyond national boundaries to match the global scale of AI networks.
Second, preventing new forms of exclusion necessitates deliberate efforts to democratise access to AI capabilities and ensure diverse cultural representation in training data.
Finally, preserving spaces for authentic cultural expression may require protections for human creative labor and community intellectual property.
Additionally, his work invites deeper investigation of emerging forms of resistance and alternative AI development that challenge dominant paradigms.
By viewing generative AI through Castells' network society theory, we gain a more nuanced understanding of how these technologies extend and transform broader social processes rather than simply disrupting them from outside. This perspective is essential for developing approaches to AI governance and deployment that promote equitable, culturally responsive, and socially beneficial outcomes across global networks.
References
Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. I. Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1997). The Power of Identity, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. II. Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1998). End of Millennium, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. III. Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity Press.
Comments